SCHOOLS

 There will be more information regarding  the Conejo Valley Unified School District (CVUSD) posted here as time goes on.   Return here for the latest information on our schools. 

June 29, 2006

New superintendent Contini shares some inventive views on education
By Kyle Jorrey kjorrey@theacorn.com                                                                                           June  29, 2006

SUPER MARIO-Mario Contini, the new chief of schools of CVUSD, stands with the trusty Palm Pilot which almost never leaves his side.

Born with a bright mind and a thirst for science and technology, Mario Contini Jr. grew up outside of Cleveland dreaming of becoming a famous inventor.

When he was 14, Contini created a mechanical alert system out of bicycle parts to be used by his father, Mario, who tended to drive the family's 1959 Fiat around town with the emergency brake still firmly in place.

Contini's proud father shared his son's rudimentary invention with a few business associates from Fiat, a European automobile manufacturer. The next year, according to Contini, the company installed a nearly identical device in all of its new automobiles, but no acknowledgement, thanks or compensation was offered its young inventor.

"It was the exact same hookup, only a little more finetuned, but of course they had a lot more to work with than I did. But for a little kid, mine was pretty good," said the generally humble Contini, who officially takes over this week as the new superintendent of Conejo Valley Unified School District (CVUSD).

Contini, who's coming to CVUSD after more than 30 years in nearby Fillmore-11 as chief of schools-will be relied on to drum up plenty more of those bright ideas in the near future. The 59-year-old father of three already has two clear challenges ahead: (1) replacing a man the district sees as a superhero and (2) maintaining the success of a district that ranks as one of the best in the state.

It's well known that test scores in Fillmore rose during Contini's tenure, and he said he's aware that one of his most important roles will be as motivator, someone to keep the district's staff energized.

"A beautiful pond that sits stagnant isn't going to be beautiful for very long," Contini said. "So it's important that we recirculate the water and we keep enriching it and adding nutrients to the good things we have here."

The new superintendent has wasted no time beginning to identify areas of need in the district.

"We still have a handful of (English language learners) that need to be moved up, and we still have some real high-achieving students that need alternative opportunities," Contini said. "So I think what we really have to do is keep our eyes open and our efforts at full speed ahead to keep things improving no matter how good they are."

Although the percentage of English language learners in CVUSD is much smaller than in Fillmore, Contini will still face the challenge of narrowing the achievement gap, something the California education system has struggled with for decades.

He said he's a staunch supporter of challenging English learners to achieve more, not lowering standards to accommodate them.

"Because ultimately what we're doing is a disservice to them. These kids are not going to be able to compete in real society . . . unless we do everything we can to get them caught up," Contini said.

"We have to be real careful not to use poverty or language-the limitations these kids face-as an excuse," he continued. "It's our job to overcome the odds."

Part of what it takes to overcome those odds-and to make all Conejo Valley schools better-is funding, and economically things are looking up in the district. Thanks to millions of new dollars the state has guaranteed to schools, in part because of the largest costof-living increase in many years, CVUSD will have money to spend-at least for now.

Contini said choosing how to spend that money wisely is a challenge for all districts, including his own. He said he's aware some Californians aren't happy with politicians and school administrators who just want to throw money at the state's public education problems.

"I think we have to be very careful, very strategic in how we spend the money. It has to be used efficiently," Contini said. "When we're looking at two programs, we have to ask ourselves, 'If we're going to spend money on program A versus program B, which one is going to produce the better return?'"

Contini strongly supports competitively compensating teachers and staff, calling them "the basis of everything we do for kids."

Nevertheless, the new superintendent got a healthy dose of conflict last year when the Fillmore teachers' union declared a vote of no confidence in him over an impasse in teachers' pay. Here in the Conejo, he expects to create a good working relationship with the local teachers' union, which is in a well-publicized battle with school board member Mike Dunn.

"I think the superintendent is a pivot point in the relationship between the teachers, the board and the administration," the Thousand Oaks resident said. "And in my mind, the teachers and all other employees are vital because they're the ones that make education come alive for kids."

When asked if he felt teachers' unions in California were gaining too much power, Contini simply said, "Unions should be strong."

Asked to comment on the debate about teaching values in school, an issue that came to a head last year in CVUSD during a battle over the definition of marriage in textbooks, Contini reiterated the popular notion that "it takes a village to raise a child."

"Ultimately, the responsibility for teaching values is everybody's, but it starts with the family, it starts with the home," he said. "Whether we're talking about schools or shopping malls or movie theaters,

I hope all of these areas emphasize and help reinforce values and morals and ethics."

Contini said he dealt with a similar conflict over reading materials in Fillmore and with a misguided parent-scare that condoms were going to be handed out at Fillmore High School.

"Sometimes it's a hard call and you just have to be careful there and try to reflect the common views. Fortunately, when you take things collectively, most people do have a pretty high expectation of values and morals," he said.

Contini said only by working through conflict can a district and a superintendent hope to earn the public's trust.

 

September 3, 2005

Save Our Children from Mediocre Math

 I am hoping to help influence the next CVUSD School Board Election, in that our organization would like the district to provide state approved math text books and instruction to students who would choose them.  We will have a voter information page on our web site within the next few months detailing candidates that support "Math Choice" and those who voted in favor of the "fuzzy math" program now in use. 

Currently the CVUSD is using the Everyday Math curriculum which was rejected TWICE by the State Board of Education.  The secondary mission of SOCMM is to inform CVUSD parents of the sub standard quality of the districts Math Education, and provide them with resources to supplement their children's math education. 

Please go to our website for more information on this very important issue:   http://socmm.home.att.net

Jo Anne Cobasko
 

From: Cathy Carlson  mlmlcc@yahoo.com
Date: October 27, 2004 5:56:37 PM PDT
Subject: Public comments stifled

Dear John,

Just heard about the outrageous behavior shown to you  at the CVUSD Board meeting last night.  I, too, have  been cut off and castigated for my comments.

Last spring I addressed the Board with more information on the API results, that 1/3 of our schools had failed to make the minimum 800 target 2 years ago, and last year 7 failed.  Then I told them that I had attempted to give information from Sacramento and Washington DC to the PTA Council President at their last meeting.  I reported that I had been treated very rudely and I gave my opinion that perhaps schools should drop their PTAs in favor of PFA's (Parent Faculty Associations).  I said one sentence, just  reporting the truth and giving an opinion.  For that, Didio got the microphone and chastized me, saying that the PTA had done a lot of good for the district because they network, and that she had been a member 40 years, "So don't criticize the PTA."  Well, I believe it may have been illegal for her to tell me what I could or couldn't say during public comments in her capacity as a Board member.

 Please pass this on, and I'd like to hear from some lawyers.

Cathy Carlson
Candidate for CVUSD
website under construction www.Cathy4Conejo.org
492-1791

 

Subject: Conejo Valley Unified School District
Oct 27, 2004

 
Last night was a regularly scheduled meeting of the CVUSD Board.  I was one of only three people who turned in a card to speak prior to the beginning of public comments.
  
I was the first to speak.  My subject was the sports recruiting that is taking place in our District (and most intensely at Westlake High).  Although this is an extremely sensitive and emotional issue, my comments and tone were all very professional and unemotional.  As I neared the three-minute mark, President Beaubien made it clear that I needed to wrap up.  At the three minute mark, she said I needed to finish.  I said that my remaining comments were less than a minute (or something to the effect), but she told me I could not continue.  I quietly walked away from the microphone.  I was tremendously
disappointed in her fervor to enforce the time limit when there were so few people speaking, and my subject being something of tremendous importance to the whole community.
  
The second speaker was Suzanne Duckett.  President Beaubien turned off the microphone early in Suzanne's comments, telling her that she could not talk about the issues she wanted to present.  I was amazed at this discourtesy.  Suzanne was able to submit another card and complete her comments.
  
The third speaker was Cal Johnson.  Cal was not interrupted (as I had been) as he approached his three-minute limit, and was not told to end after three minutes had expired.  He asked the room if there were any questions.  Diane McKay rushed to the secretary's desk to hand in a card to speak, then gave her three minutes to Cal.  Cal had nothing further to say at this point.
  
I am very disappointed in the double-standard shown by President Beaubien, and I will be requesting both a written and public apology.  It is actions like this that show why she should not be re-elected.
  
John Andersen
5Andersens@adelphia.net

May 24, 2004

Letter from Linda Van Dolsen to DR. Fraisse RE: The Boys & Girls Club

Dear Dr. Fraisse:

I see that the Board will be deciding the fate of the location of 2 more Boys and Girls Clubs on District property (Colina and Sequoia).

In January 2004, I sent a letter to the Board suggesting an approach to additional clubs on District property (see attachment).  I suggested that the club at Los Cerritos be considered a beta test sight and be evaluated for a time period of 1 year from the time that they opened their doors for business.  That initial year of operation has not yet passed, and the Board is considering going ahead with 2 more projects.

To date, the Boys and Girls Club at Los Cerritos has not achieved the numbers required to make it sustainable.  One need only look at the daily sign-in sheets to see this is true.  As I am sure you are well aware, these clubs will only serve a small population at the middle school level, 6th graders.  Many 6th graders do not meet the state requirement age-wise to be considered legally "latch-key"; that is, they are not of legal age to be unsupervised after school hours. Other middle schoolers (7th and 8th graders) do meet the requirement and therefore do not require supervision after school hours.

Mr. R. Hewitt of the Boys and Girls Club stated in The Star a week or so ago that the BGC at Los Cerritos was successful and had achieved its "numbers".  The stated attendance numbers do not match what people are actually seeing at the club nor do the daily signup sheets.

There have been promotions to "bring a friend for free" which is a great marketing tool, but these "free friends" should not be included in the numbers as if they were paying members.  Something just doesn't add up here.  The District should talk to the merchants in the shopping center down the street from Los Cerritos and see if they have seen any drop in the number of students descending on them in the afternoon since the BGC has opened.  Just from casual observation, there seem to be just as many students pouring into the center after school as before.

At the last City Council meeting, several Little League parents came to support the Lang Ranch Park and its planned ball fields.  Some parents commented that the Little League teams would no longer be able to hold practice at the fields at Los Cerritos because of the building of the BGC on that campus.  There is not room for them any more.

I know the District benefits from being able to share the use of the BGC building because they get a building they can use and the District doesn't have to pay the construction cost. Some campuses in the District are overcrowded and some are not.  Placing these BGCs on campuses only adds to the problems of overcrowding.  La Colina Middle School already cannot accept all 6th graders that want to attend from its feeder elementary school campuses this fall because they do not have enough classroom space for them (another Star article in the last week or so).  I know your study and inventory of facilities and usage of same is not yet complete so the District does not definitively know the extent of overcrowding on the District's campuses.  The local demographics have also changed and will continue to change as Dos Vientos reaches build out.  Right now Dos Vientos has the highest birth rate in the District. Placement of any additional buildings not dedicated to full-time classroom space on any District campus must be seriously studied in the short and long- range time frame. I think that moving ahead with additional BGC clubs at this time is premature and could lead to serious problems with land utilization in the District.

You might ask yourselves:  "Why is the BGC organization so aggressive in its promotion of their clubs on District property?"  Surely, you have seen the list of members of its Board of Directors and its major financial supporters.  If all of these individuals really wanted to benefit the residents and the businesses in Thousand Oaks in the best way, they have more than enough money and property to have pursued another venue and strategy.  They could have used their considerable resources politically and financially to work with CRPD and the City to construct large, first-class, state-of-the-art club facilities to serve the entire community.  They could have supported all families in the Conejo Valley who could use an inexpensive, quality, daycare setting instead of just a chosen few.

I thank you for your time and look forward to seeing you soon.

Sincerely,

Linda J. Van Dolsen

 

 

 

December 6, 2003

Here we go again!  Property taxes for the CVUSD!  Is it needed?
Do you support it?

Hold onto your wallet !

February 4, 2002

$356 MILLION DOLLAR SCHOOL BOND ON THE MARCH 2002 BALLOT WILL COST VENTURA COUNTY TAXPAYERS $18.97 PER $100,000 OF ASSESSED VALUATION FOR THIRTY (30) YEARS.

If your home is assessed at $500.000 your yearly tax bill will increase by $112.90 for the next 30 years.

Let's see
    First it was Landscape & Lighting
        then the Conejo Valley Unified School District Bond
            then Park & Recreation District Assessment,
Now the Ventura County Community College District and even the Conejo Valley Unified School District has managed to climb on the band wagon again because they have run out of funds (see UACT Nov.pdf).

WHEN ARE WE GOING TO DEMAND FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY FROM OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS?  

In December 4, 2001, the District's governing board unanimously voted to place a $356 million general obligation bond on the March 2002 Ventura County ballot. If passed, the bond would financially support the renovation, upgrading and building of needed facilities throughout the District.

The bonds would be sold in increments over a period of 10 years. It's important to know that Ventura County taxpayers would pay $18.97 per $100,000 of assessed value on their yearly property tax bill until the bond is paid off in 30 years. The law specifies that citizen oversight committees would be in place to oversee the sale and repayment of the bonds (Oh Yea!, we have seen how well that has worked in Thousand Oaks) and the construction of each project.

Want more information:

 List of Projects or   View the Board Resolution for the Bond Measure


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Copy of the March Ballot!
 

NOTE: THERE IS NO MENTION OF THE CONEJO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT FUNDS. 

DO YOU THINK THAT WAS INTENTIONAL?

O WHERE, O WHERE, HAS THE SCHOOL BOND MONEY GONE?

O WHERE, O WHERE, HAS IT GONE?

TOO WASTE, TOO WASTE IN FOOLISH SPENDING WITHOUT OVERSIGHT.

AW SHUCKS, LET'S DO IT AGAIN  IT'S ONLY THE HOMEOWNERS MONEY!

August 9, 2001
        The following letter was published in 8/9/01 issues of the ACORN and is reprinted here with Mr.
Gabrielson's permission.

RE: Community happy to see Superintendent Gross Leave"

Many Conejo Valley Unified School District (CVUSD) parents are very happy to see this Superintendent leave office. These parents would be ecstatic if the other non-valued added administrative staff (School Board, Simpson, Mortimer, Bannon, etc.) would do us the pleasure and go with Gross.

The Conejo Valley Unified School District Administrative office (Managers, Supervisors, Instructional personal, etc) are way over paid and provide no benefit to our children. They all could leave and no one would even notice. Then we can use the 5 million dollars a year in salary and pay for additional professional teachers, teachers assistance and other professionals that work directly with our children.

Students do well in the CVUSD because a) great teachers, teachers aids, principals and other staff at each school b) Motivated students c) Parent participation d) Smart parents, smart children. The teachers, staff, active parents and good children deserve the credit for high test scores, not the School Board, Gross, Simpson, etc. Each student’s performance on tests is a direct result of each child’s commitment to study the material and their support from Teachers and active Parents. This School Board and Gross do not fix into this scenario, yet they boast about how well students achieve in this district is because of them. Nothing can be more from the truth.

In these eight long years, Gross has accomplished the following: 1) Allowed the schools to fall apart while in his leadership role 2) Mismanaged the school budgets for 8 years 3) Pushed through a 88 Million dollar bond measure that was not needed 4) Wasted million of dollars on hiring Lawyers to fight parents to prevent children from receiving an appropriate education 5) allowed and approved of the district to continue to violate Federal and State Public Education law.

In conclusion, don’t let the door hit you on your way out! Do us all a favor and take the rest of your Management and staff who read newspapers and take 3-hour lunches. Let’s take that money and put it to real use by hiring more teachers and staff and reward those who really deserve it.

Barry Gabrielson
Newbury Park, CA

August 8, 2001
        Cathy Carlson a Thousand Oaks Resident and parent of children in the Conejo Unified School District (CVUSD) has tried to get the district to remove what she believes are inaccurate credentials from school literature and facilities. Her effort has fallen on deaf ears and as a last resort she has written to several local news papers with the facts as she sees them.  Her letter (5 pages) to the editor is posted here in Adobe .pdf format. 100Schools.pdf
  
E-mail Cathy Carlson at: mlmlcc@yahoo.com

January 26, 2001 
            Look! 
                CVUSD vehicle with Custom Wheels! 
                    Wonder how many books that would buy!

P1240026 wheels 1.jpg (222784 bytes)       P1240026 wheels 2.jpg (45235 bytes)

QUESTIONS: 

  1. DO WE NEED A NEW 15-20 MILLION DOLLAR SCHOOL FOR 160 STUDENTS?
  2. WHAT DOES E.T.C. STAND FOR?

SCHOOL BOARD FORUM

A School board Forum Sponsored by The Network for the CVUSD Board of Trustees was held on Saturday afternoon September 16, 2000 at the Thousand Oaks Public Library on Janss Road.   

P9160044School Forum1.jpg (59060 bytes)  P9160051Panel left1.jpg (48878 bytes)  P9160052 Panel right1.jpg (54141 bytes)

The residents in attendance submitted 54 questions. 

The two top issues were;  Overcrowding of our Schools  and Developers contribution to schools

There will be more information regarding  the goings on at CVUSD as time goes on come back here for information as Issues are exposed! 

 

 Send questions or comments about this web site to: webmaster
 Copyright © 1999-2007, wgm &
Thousand Oaks Citizens Action Network
 Web Site Design: wgm -
Last modified: 5/21/08