|
Web Changes -
This is where we'll announce the most recent additions to our web site.
If you've
visited us before and want to know what's changed, take a look here first.

There is a lot happening here in our community - get
involved !
Here are the hot topics currently on the front burner! 
A NEW YEAR BEGINS HOLD
ON TO YOUR HATS! 
August 11, 2006
Day of the Horse will be Presented on
September 9, 2006 at Conejo Creek Equestrian Park
For more information call 805-494-8755
Download and print a flyer!
Click Here>


May 10, 2006
Network members and interested Thousand
Oaks City residents!
The City, Conejo Valley Unified School District (CVUSD), Conejo
Recreation and Parks District (CRPD) and developer Shapell Industries
are exchanging property at the end of Rancho Conejo Boulevard, near the
Baxter and United Parcel Systems (UPS) facilities and the City's
Municipal Service Center. The overall net financial results are;
Costs
City of T.O.
$2,657,967
Shapell
$1,886,690
Shapell
3.29 acre parcel
CVUSD 5.29
acre parcel
Proceeds
CVUSD
$3,118,222
CRPD
$1,426,435
City of TO
3.29 acre parcel
Shapell
5.29 acre parcel
A map on the staff report makes the
property exchange more clear. ...
When this item was discussed in the May 9 Council meeting, Council members
said there was confusion in people's understanding, that an elementary
school had never been planned for Rancho Conejo. They said that the school
associated with Rancho Conejo had always been the continuation school, that
the current plans only shift the location of the school.
That may be true, partially, sort of. My understanding is that CVUSD
considered requiring Shapell to build a neighborhood elementary school to
mitigate the impact of building the Rancho Conejo Village subdivision.
Shapell resisted because land needed for a school would be much more
profitable with houses. An early tract map laid out a school site under
power lines. Eventually the property at the end of Rancho Conejo Drive was
provided instead. By this time, the attempt to plan a Rancho Conejo
neighborhood school may have been dropped, with CVUSD accepting money and
industrial land in its place. It seems CVUSD chose improved cash flow (cash
and land unsuited for school building), in place of long term capital
investment (building a neighborhood elementary school), to mitigate the
impact of this development. Now there is no place in Rancho Conejo to put
an elementary school thanks to this decision. Substituting cash flow for
long term investment is a major failure of CVUSD fiscal management, in my
opinion.
Tom Ritch
President, Thousand Oaks Citizens Action Network

March 12, 2006
Oaks Mall
Renovation Project Community Meetings Set
Residents are invited to
attend these meetings and give opinions and ask questions.
The meetings are:
 |
Thursday, March
16, 7 p.m. - Palm Garden Hotel, Ventu Park
|
 |
Wednesday, March 22, 7 p.m. - Los Robles
Greens, Moorpark Road
|
 |
Thursday, March
23, 7 p.m. - Westlake Hyatt Hotel, Westlake Blvd.
|
 |
Thursday, March
30, 7:30 p.m. - Westlake Join Board Meeting, North Ranch Community
Center |
For more information
contact: Julia B. Ladd, CSM Senior Manager,
Property Management,
The Oaks Shopping Center, 222 W. Hillcrest Drive,
Thousand Oaks, CA, 91360
or call:
805-495-4628.

January 16, 2006
It may be only January, but residents
should remember the shenanigans of the City Council when election time rolls
around! The Thousand Oaks Acorn has reported the situation quite
accurately in their January 12th edition.
NIH (Not Invented Here)
is alive and breeding at City Hall!
Why listen to the residents?
WE know BETTER!
Editorial:
Another reason to be angry as a voter in Thousand Oaks
The voters of Thousand Oaks have another reason to be angry this week. It
turns out that the council majority isn’t even saving the city as much money as
they thought on the special election that will never happen.
When council members Andy Fox, Dennis Gillette and Jacqui Irwin decided they
knew better than the voters of Thousand Oaks who should replace former
Councilmember Ed Masry, they thought they were saving the city between $178,00
and $250,000.
In their rush to name Masry’s replacement, they held an emergency meeting two
days after he resigned.
Despite being advised by the city attorney that they had 30 days to decide
whether to appoint or have an election, the council went full steam ahead.
After Councilmember Claudia Bill-de la Peńa suggested a special election,
Irwin disagreed on grounds that the costs were excessive. (Despite $70 million
in reserves, we couldn’t quite afford an election in Thousand Oaks.)
Council members Fox and Gillette remained mum and voted with Irwin, without
comment, to appoint Masry’s replacement. The procedure smacked of deceit. The
whole ordeal looked like it might have been a “done deal” before the meeting
even convened.
Having made one horrendously bad decision, the council majority compounded it
by allowing only seven days for applications. Only 11 days after robbing the
people of an election, the council majority chose the man who will serve for
three years on a seat that was given to him.
The council has saved our impoverished city either $150,000 (a special
election in April) or $70,000 (had the election been combined with the June
primary).
A final thought: we don’t question the abilities or dedication of
Councilmember Tom Glancy, but he didn’t earn his seat from the voters of
Thousand Oaks. It was handed to him.
Voters, however, will be heard in 11 months. In
November they can show how they feel about appointees serving on their city
council–when Fox and Gillette face reelection.
- - - - - - - - - -
Special election costs
provided to T.O. by county were too high
By Sophia Fischer sfischer@theacorn.com
A special election in Thousand Oaks would have cost significantly less than
the figures the city council considered last month in deciding to appoint rather
than elect a replacement for the seat vacated by Ed Masry. The updated
information was provided to the city the week an appointment was made, according
to city officials.
Instead of the $178,000 the council was quoted and the $250,000 figure city
staff came up with, the actual cost of a special election would run between
$50,000 and $70,000 if held in conjunction with the June or November elections,
or $150,000 if the city held its own, independent election.
Ventura County elections representatives provided some of the incorrect
figures, according to Gene Browning, county assistant registrar of voters.
Browning and the county’s election cost estimator were both in Sacramento on
business at the time Thousand Oaks asked about special election fees.
“Somebody else did the best they could handling something they don’t usually
handle,” Browning said. “There was some question because the city misconstrued
the situation as if they were going to hold a special election on their own.”
One of the options the city had considered was holding an independent
election in April using a private firm that staff estimated would cost $250,000.
The corrected figure, provided by an independent elections company, is $150,000.
Under the updated fees, the city would hold its special election either with
the June state primary at a cost of $65,000 to $70,000 or with the November
general election at a cost of $50,000. The original incorrect figure was given
as $178,000 if the election were held in June and $142,000 if held in November.
The original report was made on Dec. 2, the same day the council voted to
appoint rather than elect a replacement. A corrected report was issued by the
county on Dec. 13, according to Browning. That night the council met and chose
Planning Commission Chair Tom Glancy for the seat after interviewing 32
candidates. The city didn’t receive the updated information until the following
day, Dec. 14, according to Interim City Clerk Linda Lawrence. Glancy was sworn
in on Dec. 15.
The city clerk’s office provided the new figures to the city manager on Dec.
28, added Lawrence, and council members received the information after that.
Mayor Dennis Gillette said he was given the new information last week.
Nancy Dillon, former city clerk who retired in December but who is
temporarily working for the city on a part-time basis, said her office didn’t
disseminate the information right away. an election
“We were reconfirming the dollars after there was a question,” Dillon said.
“It just takes time to contact people and get the information back.”
Gillette said having the correct costs may have made him reconsider holding a
special election.
“Cost was a considerable issue for me even though there are those who tried
to trivialize its significance,” Gillette said. “I don’t know if there would
have been a change in my vote.”
He also pointed out that the council had 30 days from Masry’s Nov. 30
resignation to make a decision on whether to appoint or elect.
“I based my decision on the information I had before me at the time,”
Gillette said.
Councilmember Jacqui Irwin said she was disappointed with the county’s error
in providing incorrect information. But she still expressed concern with the
city’s finances.
“Thousand Oaks is dealing with spiraling public safety costs and still trying
to replenish the emergency fund that the council voted to draw from a couple of
months ago. Whereas the city is not in a poor financial position, it does have
considerable future financial obligations (the teen center expansion, employee
pension and medical liabilities, etc.) and is required to keep a minimum reserve
level,” Irwin said. “We always need to be thoughtful about expending money and
this is especially true as we transition into maintenance mode.”
Councilmember Claudia Billde la Peńa was the only council member to vote in
favor of a special election. Neither she nor Councilmember Andy Fox returned
phone messages left by the Thousand Oaks Acorn.
NOTE: Add an arrow
to your quiver!
If you would like a copy of the above articles pick up a copy of the January
12th Acorn or print a copy of these articles by clicking on the following .pdf
file. January 12th
Acorn Editorial and Article

January 10, 2006
The public knew it all along and told
the City Council MAJORITY they were wrong!
But once again they (Fox, Irwin &
Gillette) new better!
The Ventura County Star reported today;
" Weeks after the Thousand
Oaks City Council decided to appoint someone rather than hold an election to
fill Councilman Ed Masry's seat, city officials now have new, lower cost
estimates for such an election."
" Council members
initially were presented with cost figures of perhaps more than $250,000, but
the new estimates indicate costs could have dipped below $70,000 depending on
timing of the election and other factors. "
" The new
estimates were gathered after a council member asked for clarification on the
cost, City Manager Scott Mitnick said. He would not disclose which council
member made the request."
" Besides cost,
the need for seeing the seat filled quickly and the role of elected officials as
decision makers also were brought up by council members during a Dec. 2 meeting
when the council voted 3-1 in favor of appointment. Claudia Bill-de la Pena cast
the dissenting vote. "
To read he complete
article by Jean Ortiz see:
Election estimate comes in lot lower
in today's Ventura County Star.

January 8, 2006
Democracy in action -
take a few minutes and give you opinion!
Want another school
bond? Do nothing and that's what you'll get! Network
members,
Mike Dunn requests public input on issues scheduled to be considered by
the CVUSD Board of Education. To help Mike get input from as broad a
sample of the public as possible, please forward this request to others who
may have an opinion to express on school schedules or funding issues.
Tom Ritch
President, Thousand Oaks Citizens Action Network
www.thousand-oaks.org
Begin forwarded message:
December 23, 2005 7:11:35 AM PST
Editor, Acorn:
I do not know why you did not publish
this letter.
You also did not reply why I asked for
an explanation. All I am
asking for is fairness.
I am asking for the public to participate in an
opinion poll on two important local issues.
Do you want Christmas vacation in 2006 to start
December 16, 20 or 23rd?
Do you want the district to borrow money to build
the joint use facility or use Measure R funds?
For the Christmas vacation question, write 16 or
20 or 23 on the subject line.
Please put a "W" next
to your choice if you work for the district.
For the joint use facility question, please type
"BORROW" if you want to borrow money.
Please type
"MEASURE R" if you want to use Measure R funds to pay
for construction.
For example, a 16WBORROW in the email subject
line means you want the vacation to start December 16.
You work for the
district. You want
to borrow money to build the joint use
facility.
Background:
Christmas vacation 2006 is scheduled
to start on December 23.
The teachers' union made this decision.
After complaints, the school board
decided unanimously to resubmit the issue back to the
teachers' union for renegotiation.
The board will reconsider this
issue and take a final vote in January.
The joint use facility is designed to replace the
Conejo High School on Newbury Road.
The original cost to the district was 2 million dollars.
The cost is
now up to 5 million dollars and rising.
The board has already voted 4-1 to build the joint use facility on
land adjacent to the district headquarters on Janss
Road.
Next the school board will decide how to finance
the facility.
We have 21.9 million dollars from the
sale of Measure R bonds sitting in the bank unspent
and not contracted
to any projects yet.
But, the
voters were promised that the money would be spent on
specific projects when they voted on the bond issue.
Here is what I need to know.
We have two choices.
Do we break our promise, postpone some
projects and spend 5 million dollars from Measure R?
Or do we borrow 5 million dollars?
Note, borrowing money will
probably force the district to seek a
property or parcel tax increase to pay for the
additional debt.
The poll closes on January 9th.
Results will be posted on my
website
www.mike4schoolboard.com.
Results will also be forwarded to staff, teachers' union
leadership and board members.
The board will vote on both issues in January.
Your participation in this poll will allow me to
make
an intelligent decision which represents the will of
the people.
Michael A. "Mike" Dunn
Trustee, Conejo Valley Unified School District
1014 Antelope Place
Newbury Park, CA 91320
805-499-2596
January 4, 2006
The following article
from the Star today points out a reason Democracy in Thousand Oaks may have been
pushed aside!

WHAT DO YOU THINK?
GIVE US
YOUR OPINION!
Send an email to: webmaster

HISTORY
(Past chronology of News Items follows - If you would like to catch up!)

April 30, 2005
This past couple of weeks the
reigning FIG configuration (Fox, Irwin, Gillette) on the City Council
have proven through their actions that the residents of Thousand Oaks are not
the primary constituent base for this trio.
If you need
convincing go to the
GATCH-GATE Page
and draw your own conclusions. 
March 24, 2005
City Council approves Arts Festival support
March 24, 2005
The Thousand Oaks City
Council approved up to $10,000 worth of support, including staff services and
parking, for the Thousand Oaks Arts Festival.
The festival will be held
for its second year in September.
Councilwoman Jacqui Irwin
was chosen as the council representative for the festival.
City of Thousand Oaks
adopts a NIH* attitude when it comes to supporting Local Art Festival!
Read all about in the Conejo Valley Art
Museum newsletter.
*Not Invented Here

February 17, 2005
Comments on the
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (DEIR) No. 323,
The Oaks Mall Renovation/Expansion. ON HOLD!
are due at the City by Tuesday, February 22, 2005.
Please go to the
Oaks Mall page and read the latest information.
Then send you comments to the City.

January 25, 2005
There will be a general meeting of the
Network on Tuesday, February 15, 2005
For complete information and details go
the Meeting page on this web site.

January 24,2005
Subject: PRESS
RELEASE and Flyer
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
January 24, 2005
"RALLY TO SAVE OUR RANCH" SEEKS TO PROTECT BROOME RANCH AND ADJACENT
PROPERTIES
THOUSAND OAKS – Rally To Save Our Ranch, an advocacy group, has been formed by
a group of local residents and equestrians who have joined together to promote
the protection of the properties south of Lynn Road by Two Winds Ranch, commonly
called Broome Ranch. Three contiguous properties across from Dos Vientos Ranch
all lie within the boundary of the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation
Area and, without protections in place, have the threat of development looming
over them. The parcel on which Two Winds Ranch sits has been a bone of
contention between open space advocates and those who believe the property
should remain available for additional uses by the City of Thousand Oaks and the
Conejo Recreation and Park District who jointly own it. The West Bay property
owners have put all their properties in this area, except the acreage along Lynn
Road, into Land Conservation Protection. But their "protected" properties can
easily become "unprotected" if they so choose. "Site I" is designated for three
home sites.
In July 2003, over one thousand residents, equestrians, and others signed a
petition asking the City Council to protect these three properties. No Council
action has been taken other than a unanimous vote in November 2003 to keep the
equestrian center at the Two Winds Ranch site and allocate $500,000 for its
upgrade. However, that vote is jeopardized by recent Council action.
Rally To Save Our Ranch is headed up by John Fonti, a board
member of the homeowners association across from these properties and Sue
Egan, an equestrian boarder at Two Winds Ranch. They, and their group, believe
that there is a mutual benefit in working together to ensure that no new
development is allowed on the south side of Lynn Road, the boundary for the
Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area. They also believe that by
keeping an affordable equestrian center in the current location protects the
residents of Dos Vientos Ranch, the equestrians who prefer a rustic center, and
also the taxpayers of Thousand Oaks who feel that the City should not waste
money developing an expensive equestrian center elsewhere on that property.
“I haven’t met one person who says they want development south of Lynn Road.
Let's work together to ensure that Lynn Road becomes the line between
development and open space.” says John Fonti.
Information:
John Fonti
Phone: 805-376-6097
E-mail: john.fonti@adelphia.net
Click here for a .pdf
copy to download! 
TWO WINDS FLYER
City Council Reneges on
Promise to Residents
In November, 2003, over 200 residents and equestrians showed up at the City
Council meeting and the Council heard us loud and clear. They voted 5-0 to
keep the Two Winds Equestrian Center where it is and allocate $500,000 for its
upgrade. The newspaper editorials praised the vote. Councilman Gillette
said: “It was democracy in action.”
Then, at 11:30 pm last Tuesday, with no residents to object, the
Council reversed themselves when three council members voted against spending
the money for the Equestrian Center upgrade. Councilman Fox and newly-elected
Jacqui Irwin now say they want to evaluate moving the
Equestrian Center, and Gillette said: “I will never support any expenditure for
Two Winds.”
This is a complete reversal! The Council was moving ahead with upgrades
to beautify the Equestrian Center and choose a permanent operator. Now, that’s
all in jeopardy!
• RESIDENTS BETRAYED If Fox, Gillette and Irwin had left well enough
alone we’d be closer to an upgraded equestrian facility we can all be proud of.
Will our property values be higher with a beautiful upgraded equestrian center
across the street or with an Andy Fox Memorial
Stadium or something else?
They will tell you “there are no plans” for the land but they have proven they
cannot be trusted. They’ll dust off their old arguments that it is better to
move Two Winds Ranch over the hill. It is better
for the environment, there will be less smell, it will be less costly, etc.
Don’t believe them. The reason they want to move it is they have plans for this
flat, easily accessible land on Lynn Road.
• DO YOU WANT LIGHTED BALL FIELDS, SPORTS CENTERS AND OTHER NOISIER
FACILITIES? MORE TRAFFIC? Of course not. The only way to protect the
land from becoming a “monument to politicians” is to keep the Equestrian
Center where it is!
• TELL THE COUNCIL TO KEEP TWO WINDS RANCH WHERE IT IS!
Attend the Council Meeting Tuesday, February 8th at 6 PM and bring your family,
your friends, your neighbors. Call the Council’s voicemail.
Send e-mails and letters to the Council and Local Newspapers!
Address for hardcopy correspondence to Council:
Thousand Oaks City Hall,
2100 Thousand Oaks Boulevard,
Thousand Oaks, CA 91362.
Click here for a .pdf
copy to download!

DECEMBER 2004
Mayor Claudia
Bill-De La Pena' s Speech
Thousand Oaks, December 2004
It is my honor to serve the people of Thousand Oaks as its new mayor. In 1995,
my husband and I moved here. Immediately, we embraced the city with its hometown
feel, enormous charm and unique beauty, and believed we would do well to set
down roots.
Listening to friends and neighbors’ stories gave me insight to how things are,
and how they used to be. Since incorporation 40 years ago, much has changed in
Thousand Oaks. What happens in Thousand Oaks over the next few years will
certainly have an impact on the generations to come.
I share the vision our community strives for:
* quality of life
* responsible and ethical government
* open space and preserving natural resources
* public safety
* economic stability
* affordable housing
* good schools
During my two years on the council, I have maintained my focus on these goals
and principles. My record demonstrates my commitment. One of my very first
actions was to hold town hall meetings in the community, to make government more
responsive to you. The town hall meetings bore several success stories:
* All three high schools received a total of $ 3.1 million dollars for stadium
improvements.
* The neighborhood most impacted by the traffic from the Dos Vientos
Development, was finally able to be heard after ten years of pleading. Noise
mitigation is now on its way. But there are so many other neighborhoods that
need help with noise mitigation.
* Conejo Valley’s oldest school house, Timber School, is now a historic
landmark. The next step is for the city to acquire the school so it can be
preserved for future generations to enjoy.
* The city has also begun the process to change the designation of the area next
to Rancho Protrero in Newbury Park, from residential to open space. This was
done after residents presented a petition of 1,100 signatures to the council,
asking that the natural resources across from Dos Vientos Ranch (south of Lynn/Protrero
Road) be protected from development. When the time comes for a final vote, this
would make a great opportunity for the council to listen to our residents, while
working with property owners at the same time. The same area also includes a
parcel known as Site I. The owners of Site I are willing to sell, and I hope my
colleagues will soon join in the preservation of that open space and vote to
acquire it.
* We are also in the process of upgrading and improving the only semi-public
equestrian center known as Two Winds Ranch. This is the result of horse owners
and Dos Vientos homeowners coming together to preserve the rural atmosphere and
charm.
* Over the next year, I look forward to leading the council to build consensus
on our values and to maintain the foundations established in our general plan.
The general plan will be celebrating its 35th birthday next year. It is a
vision in and of itself. It guides us, helping us to balance the need for a
healthy environment with the need for a vital economy.
* One of the architects of this plan is still with us today. He is city manager
Phil Gatch. Mr. Gatch has witnessed this city grow from a rural sleepy town, to
a vibrant bustling city, a city which - as fine as it is - has been experiencing
tremendous growing pains. Many councils have been grappling with those pains,
including the current one. How much more traffic can be jammed onto our roads?
How much more traffic noise can we take day in and day out? How many more
students can we fit into classrooms? How do we deal with increasing crime?
There is pressure to build apartments all along Thousand Oaks Boulevard, known
as mixed use.
There is pressure to almost double the size of The Oaks Mall, increasing car
trips by the tens of thousands.
There is pressure to build
parking structures. At what cost? All those pressures are slowly but surely
suffocating our quality of life. I hear the complaints from residents every
week. If the residents are fed up with too much traffic, density and crowded
classrooms, then who is pushing the city to build more and build higher? I think
you know the answer.
I intend to continue scrutiny of our fiscal affairs and see to it that our tax
dollars are used wisely and responsibly. We will devise solutions to the
problems facing our city.
* That includes the day laborer site. It’s controversial and challenging. The
day laborer site cannot stay in a residential area. I believe it violates the
general plan. Some of the day laborers may be
illegal immigrants. They must face the consequences - as do the people who hire
them. Additionally, the city has chosen not to spend $ 50,000 of your tax
dollars to upgrade the laborer site.
* But tax dollars must and should be used to reopen the east county jail. The
sheriff felt it necessary to close it because of budget constraints. He and the
district attorney sued the cash-strapped county over funding for salaries and
benefits, among other things. Even though Thousand Oaks is the only city in the
county to have joined the sheriff and district attorney in their lawsuit, I
suggest that the city partner with the county and our neighbors to cover the
cost of $400,000 to keep the jail open for six months or until the lawsuit is
resolved. I believe the jail has sadly become a political football, and the
residents are the ones losing out. The council will work diligently to resolve
this issue.
* As supporters of small businesses, the city must weigh the impacts another
Home Depot at the old K-mart site will have on home improvement-type businesses
on Thousand Oaks Boulevard.
* We must continue to provide affordable housing as best we can with the
implementation of an Inclusionary Housing Ordinance.
* And we must continue to foster our relationships with other government
entities such as the Conejo Valley Unified School District and the Conejo
Recreation & Park District.
I will continue to support open government, and promote an inviting forum at all
meetings and encourage our citizens to be engaged in the city. Together, I know
we will continue to sustain our fine city with its outstanding employees, and
keep us as one of America’s most desired cities. I hold my place on the council
and as mayor as a public trust. That’s why I will continue to stay true to my
pledges of genuine slow growth and fiscal conservatism. I will stay true to my
own values, which put me here in the first place. It is my fervent hope that
ethics and moral values will find their way back into government.
As President Harry Truman once said, "I never did give anybody hell. I just told
the truth and they thought it was hell." I will not hesitate to tell the
truth. And borrowing from President Ronald
Reagan: “... thanks to all of you and with God’s help, Thousand Oaks’ greatest
chapter is still to be written, for the best is yet to come.”

November 5, 2004
Committee being formed to look into problems on North Lynn
Road

October 27, 2004
MEASURE B THE FACTS!
Click here for Measure B Info
Click
here for Schools info 
October 26, 2004
Final Candidates Forum To Be Televised
The Election '04 event, held this past Sunday at the Westlake Hyatt, will
be rebroadcast on Adelphia.
The forum had a Bush-Kerry forum, followed by a school board candidates
forum, and ended with a city council candidates forum.
If you want to know what the issues of this campaign are and where we
all stand, please tune in to the debate!
Tell a friend! Tell a neighbor!!! Forward the dates and times to others
that you know in our city!
The debate will air on Adelphia on Ch. 25, and will air on Ch. 8 on
Charter Communications in Thousand Oaks.
Rebroadcast dates and times:
 |
October 26 (Tuesday) 1:00 PM |
 |
October 28 (Thursday) 7:00 PM |
 |
October 29 (Friday) 11:00 AM |
 |
October 31 (Sunday) 3:00 PM
|

October 12, 2004
Noise,
Noise, Noise,
Noise, Noise,
Noise,
Noise!
The traffic situation
continues worsen in this City. Those in power refuse to listen to the residents
or even consider ways to mitigate the situation. There has been request after
request for a complete evaluation of the TRAFFIC, NOISE
and POLLUTION in this city. Please lets us
know if you are as concerned as we think you are!
Please go to the
LYNN ROAD page an take the survey.

October 4, 2004
 |
The School Board Race is really HOT! this
election as illustrated by the fact that there are 3 MAJOR FORUMS
- the SAME number as for the City Council Race.
While often, the only parties attending forums, besides
the "PRESS" (who report to the public), are the people/supporters a
candidate brings with them, the fact is that Perception is everything
-- and the perception of support is highly-effective voter
persuasion.
|
Wednesday, October 6th,
7:00 PM
TELEVISED |
Conejo Valley Unified School
District Offices
Board Room - (Big Building in
the Back)
1400 East Janss Road, Thousand
Oaks
League of Women Voters and AAUW
(American Association of University Women) |
|
Wednesday, October 20th,
Approx. 8:00 PM (following the City
Council Forum) |
Dos Vientos Community Center -
Borchard Road (Top of Borchard Road)
Dos Vientos Ranch East Master
Association |
|
Sunday, October 24th,
4:00 PM - 7 PM TELEVISED |
Hyatt Hotel - 880 South
Westlake Boulevard, Westlake Village
Conejo Council PTA |
|
 | A Candidates Forum was held on Wednesday September 29th
at the Thousand Oaks Library. Save the Conejo 2000 orginazied the event
and the forum was filmed by ADELPHIA and will be rebroadcast as follows: |
Friday, October 8,
@ 3:30 PM
Thursday, October 14, @ 10:00 AM
Friday October 15, @ 3:30 PM
|
Ch. 25
|
WILL AIR ON ADELPHIA
Agoura, Agoura Hills, Calabasas, Camarillo,
Fillmore, Moorpark, Newbury Park, Oak Park, Piru, Santa Paula,
Thousand Oaks, Westlake Village |
|
Ch. 8
|
Charter Communications in
Thousand Oaks |
|
Ch. 3 |
Charter Communications in
Morrison Ranch |

June 19, 2004
Planning Commissioner Michael Farris (
http://www.michaelfarris.com/ ) announced his candidacy for City Council.
A TRUE
SLOW GROWTH CANDIDATE WHO WILL REMAIN TRUE TO HIS WORD.
Recently residents have been misled by
those running for council promising one thing to get elected then turning there
back on the very promises they made to the community.
This will not happen
with Michael (Mic) Farris! The
residents of Thousand Oaks have had many years to observe his commitment to slow
and prudent growth through his service to this community on the planning
commission.
This is evident by the support he received
on June 19th, from
current and former Planning Commissioners from the city and the county in
attendance -- Ventura County Supervisor Linda Parks, Thousand Oaks Mayor Pro Tem
Claudia Bill-de la Pena, Janet Wall, Sue Boecker, Nora Aidukas, Jan Osterhaven,
and Marilyn Carpenter.
Michael made his announcement near where they're
ripping out oak trees to make way for a Claim Jumper restaurant and building the
shopping center on public land next to City Hall (all with the taxpayers
subsidizing the effort.....). Clearly this is wrong and reason enough for the
Council to be changed.
Michael, also showed renderings of what's planned for the Oaks Mall expansion -- a
project that has two massive parking structures lining the 101 freeway. This
didn't even show the multi-screen cineplex (and parking structure) scheduled for
Phase 2 that'd be right along the 101 (where the Armstrong nursery and large
parking area is....)
What has Bob Wilson say about this expansion,
"I am very strongly in
favor of this project" (Thousand Oaks Acorn, May 27, 2004).
The City is working with the owners of the
Oaks Mall to renovate the existing Mall. Actually the Oaks Mall is going to be
enlarged and will become Ventura County's largest such shopping area.
Want more information on this go to our
"OAKS MALL" page!
BEFORE EXPANSION AFTER PROPOSED EXPANSION

Click on picture to enlarge
"OAKS MALL INFO"

HISTORY
(Past chronology of News Items follows - If you would like to catch up!)

MARCH 8, 2004

(photo from the Ventura County Star)
Mayor Bob Wilson (owner of Cisco's Mexican Restaurants), retreats from his
once committed position on "Slow Growth".
It's not just the 20 people who worked to get you elected as you claim Mr. Mayor,
it's the 12,608
residents who voted for you because they took you at your WORD.
Where is the EIR?
Has the City violated the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)?
TO READ MORE OF WHAT
THIS MEANS TO OUR CITY CLICK HERE February 9, 2004


December 23, 2003
City Council in disarray over VENTURA COUNTY OPEN SPACE
DISTRICT proposal!
 | Some Council members want money collected in
Thousand Oaks with the proposed tax be spent here in Thousand Oaks. |
 | Others think that stopping development north of
Thousand Oaks by procuring open space parcels as they become available will
benefit all Ventura County residents. |
All of us who have been out in the city traffic this
holiday season can attest to the fact that we now have the San Fernando valley
right here in our once peaceful community.
We all know what the 23 freeway looks like at rush hour
in the morning and night Imagine if you will, if development continues at the
current pace what the 101 freeway will be like in five years. UGH!
DO YOU HAVE ANY THOUGHTS ON THIS SUBJECT?
SEND US AN EMAIL AND IT WILL BE POSTED ON THE "Voice
of the Community" PAGE.

December 6, 2003
Just published the Safest City rankings for this year
and Thousand Oaks has the same ranking as last year! 6th in the nation in
cities with over 100,000 population.
1st Amherst, NY
2nd Brick
Township , NJ
3rd Mission Viejo, CA
4th Simi Valley, CA
5th Cary, NC
6th Thousand Oaks, CA
(at one time T. O. was #1)
7th Colonie, NY
8th Clarkstown, NY
9th Orem, UT
10th Sunnyvale, CA
For more information see:
City Crime Rankings (10th
Edition) (ISBN 0-7401-0913-8)

June 25, 2003
THE NETWORK IS LOOKING FOR A NEW LOCATION TO HOLD IT'S MONTHLY MEETINGS.
IF YOU KNOW OF A LOCATION IN THE CONEJO THAT WOULD LIKE TO HOST OUR MEETINGS
PLEASE SEND DETAILS TO: mailto:wesmac@aol.com
NO RESPONSE!!!!!

May 29, 2003
 | Boys & Girls Club
APPROVED!
|
 | Here it is May of 2003 and our
State government is in slug mode.
If you are so inclined go to
Davis Recall.com download a Recall
Petition sign and return it and find four others to do the same.
|

March 26,2003
Rancho
Potrero Equestrian Center information page added!

March 3, 2003
The Coalition for Competent Leadership (CCL).
What is it?
What are the aims and goals of this Political Action Committee (PAC)?
Who are the movers and shakers who belong to this org?
For more information click here:
CCL PAC

February 11,
2003
Information flyer on attempt to build Boys & Girls Clubs at Conejo Valley School
Campuses. Go to B&G Clubs page.

February 4,
2003
PERCHLORATE at Ahmanson - Perchlroate
is a substance known to cause cancer in adults and mental retardation in
newborns. This dangerous chemical has been found in multiple locations in
Ventura County. Like MTBE, it moves rapidly through soil and groundwater and
poses a threat to the health of the community.
The California State Assembly's Natural Resources Committee, chaired
by Assembly member Hannah-Beth Jackson, is holding a
hearing to increase public awareness and action on the issue of perchlorate
contamination in local soil and groundwater.
Cancer-causing perchlroate is in Ventura County.
Learn what can be done to address the public health danger:
Monday, February 10th at 7:00 pm
Thousand Oaks Civic Arts Plaza - Founder's Room
2100 Thousand Oaks Blvd.
Please call (805) 648-9943 with any questions.

January 26,
2003
New Page added: Boys &
Girls Clubs. Are they needed or better yet,
Wanted?

December 27, 2002

This cartoon is posted here with the
permission of the artist Steve Greenberg and the Thousand Oaks Star.
The questions now remain:
 |
Have we seen the end of the Ahmanson
controversy? |
 |
Is the discovery of Perchlorate in
Ahmanson going to provide a health problem similar to the Love Canal in
Niagara Falls, New York? |
 |
Will law suites continue for the next
ten or fifteen years? |
 |
Will Washington Mutual Bank lose
business in the Conejo and surrounding communities?
|
 |
Will Ex-Supervisor, Frank Schillo
be remembered for the good he has done in the Conejo Valley or will the name
Schillo become synonymous with gridlock on the freeway and city streets?
|
 |
Will the approximately two remaining
miles of Thousand Oaks Blvd. Between Kanan Road and Las Virgenes-Malibu Canyon
be constructed? When that happens the Conejo Valley will be linked to the San
Fernando Valley ( T. O. Blvd.- Ahmanson Ranch Blvd.-Victory Blvd.).
|
Stay tuned to this site for updates!

DECEMBER 10, 2002
A NEW CHAPTER IN THE THOUSAND OAKS CITY GOVERNMENT
BEGINS.
We now have a council that will TRULY put residents' concerns first.
They
will not only listen but will act in the best interest of us all.
We look
forward to a very productive future.
THE CITY COUNCIL HAS FOR THE FIRST TIME A TRUE SLOW GROWTH MAJORITY!
IT IS OUR BELIEF THAT THIS NEW COUNCIL WILL TRULY
PUT RESIDENTS FIRST IN THEIR DECISIONS.
OUT WITH THE OLD
With
the removal of Dan Del Campo from the council the pro-growth advocates
will have to look elsewhere for someone to feather their beds.
IN WITH THE NEW

Claudia Bill De Pena and Bob Wilson take the oath of
office for the fist time., along with Andy Fox and Dennis Gillette.

The Election is over and for the first time since Moby
Dick was a minnow the Residents of Thousand Oaks have a majority on the City
Council!
It has been a long time coming and has taken a lot of
dedicated work by many, many individuals. Congratulations to all who helped in
any way. We would like to take this opportunity to congratulate Claudia BILL de
la Pena and Bob Wilson for their win on Tuesday, November 5th and thank them for stepping
forward to accept the challenges that lay ahead. We are well aware of the
sacrifices that will be made to make this community once again a wonderful place
to call home.
In the coming months there are many issues to be
addressed and concerns that residents have had for years that have fallen on
deaf ears now is the time for action!

August 23, 2002
Is Thousand Oaks one of
the Safest Cities in America?
Thousand Oaks used to be the safest city in America but Amherst, New York has
held the distinction for the past five years. Here are the facts as reported by
Morgan Quitno Press, a Lawrence, Kansas-based publishing and research company.
http://www.morganquitno.com
|
Most Dangerous Order |
Safest Order |
City |
Score |
2000 Population |
| 327 |
1 |
Amherst, New York
|
(89.94) |
109,574
|
| 326 |
2 |
Newton, MA |
(84.21) |
82,400 |
| 325 |
3 |
Mission Viejo, CA |
(78.83) |
100,198 |
| 324 |
4 |
Cary, NC |
(77.21) |
95,964 |
| 323 |
5 |
Brick Township, NJ |
(73.31) |
78,794 |
| 322 |
6 |
Simi Valley, CA |
(71.86) |
116,751 |
| 321 |
7 |
Sunnyvale, CA |
(70.60) |
130,115 |
| 320 |
8 |
Colonie, New York |
(69.98) |
82,253 |
| 319 |
9 |
Sterling Heights, MI |
(68.21) |
125,514 |
| 318 |
10 |
Clarkstown, New York |
(68.07) |
84,240 |
| 317 |
11 |
Orem, UT |
(66.48) |
86,990 |
| 316 |
12 |
Greece, New York |
(65.61) |
95,772 |
| 315 |
13 |
Thousand
Oaks, CA |
(63.09) |
121,805 |
Thousand Oaks at one time was #1.
Mr. Fox, Gillette, & Del Campo this happened on your watch!!!
Don't tell us how good you've done! The facts don't lie!

August
16, 2002
Growth is necessary! Do not believe it!
The T. O. Troika* (Fox, Gillette, Del Campo) would have you believe that growth
is necessary. Nothing could be further from the truth! Read the Following:
"Myths About Growth" (Adobe.pdf)
Look around you, evaluate for yourself the traffic, increased speeds on our city
streets, noise, crime, pollution, and the frazzled nerves of those trying to get
from point A to point B in a reasonable amount of time. Is it just our
imagination or are the residents of this once tranquil city loosing their cool!
Nobody smiles anymore if I didn't know better I would think I was back east in a
major city.
TROIKA vs. SLATE
The election for City Council boils down to: Who Are You Going To Believe!
Those who favor the special interests or those who will listen and take the best
interests of the residents into account when they make their decisions! Go
to
ELECTION 2002
page for a reminder.
* TROIKA (from word "three").
According to the dictionary TROIKA is :
1. a Russian carriage, wagon, or sleigh drawn by a team of three horses abreast.
2. a team of three horses driven abreast.
3. any group of three persons, nations, etc., acting equally in unison to exert
influence,
control, or the like.
The next time you hear "The T. O.
TROIKA" refer to a SLATE remember they are a "TROIKA" pulling a wagon full of
developers, special interests, and very very few residents.
Stampede the TROIKA!

July 23, 2002
East Side Development of the Civic Arts Plaza -
Finally this area (which should have graded and trees and grass planted when the
Civic Arts Plaza was finished instead of being allowed to become an eyesore)
will be developed instead of being used as a storage place for Dirt! Is this
going to become another "door ding" parking lot? The City Council Majority
(Del Campo, Fox, Gillette, aka the T. O. Troika) approved a "development
agreement" for a 48,000-square-foot complex that will include a plaza, an
informal performance stage or amphitheater, a clock tower, two ponds,
an ice-skating rink and a partridge in a pear tree, in the
belief that it is "a strategic fit to the boulevard" or is it a
$12,000,000.00 gift to the developer and a misappropriation of tax payer
funds? You make that decision read the facts at
ELECTION 2002.

July
14, 2002
 | Noise page redesigned to reflect
current conditions in Thousand Oaks. |
 | New meeting dates added go to meeting information page. |

June
26, 2002
The Noise Pollution Clearinghouse
http://www.nonoise.org has posted a link to
our organization on their web site. They are also added on our
links page.
The Network is among many organization around the county
and the world who are very concerned with the ever increasing noise pollution
and other environmental concerns facing us today.
Visit this site and read some of the very interesting
information published there and visit other communities around the world who are
facing similar problems that we here in the Conejo Valley are facing.

June
23, 2002
Why would a German Company RWE http://www.rwe.com with an English Subsidiary
Thames Water
http://www.thames-water.com/ want to take control of the California
-American Water Company a Division of American Water Works Company, Inc.
http://www.amwater.com (NYSE: AWK)?
 | Let's see, AWK stock has risen from $10.938 on
6/30/1992 and closed on 5/31/2002 at $43.51. Could RWE & Thames Water
be looking for a cash cow? |
 | Mr. James E. Harrison, Vice President, Investor
Relations, (www.amwater.com) indicated in a recent Forward Looking Statement "These factors
include, among others, the following: the success of pending applications for
rate increases, inability to obtain, or to meet conditions imposed for
regulatory approval of pending acquisitions," "changes in, or the failure to
comply with governmental regulations, particularly those affecting the
environment and water quality," |
 | Cal-Am Customers here in Thousand Oaks Pay 33% more
than the City supplied water and the water in both cases is bought from the
same source. |

June 20, 2002
Just when we thought we had heard it all, up jumps a new
definition that our lovely local developers have come up with to describe the
development of shopping plazas, track malls or a retail development.
Heard today at the PUC hearing at the Newbury Park high school auditorium are
you ready? Now don't laugh!
Development is now called "LIFE STYLE CENTERS."
For other developer definitions see The
developer playbook.

June 10, 2002
Planning Commission Majority (Clancy, Hoffman, Bruno)
ignores citizen concerns and a faulty EIR report and approves a 90,000 sq ft
department store that will bring Noise, Traffic, Pollution and Crime to a
residential neighborhood in Newbury Park.

May 10, 2002
The Friendliest of Skies or Added Noise and pollution
in your back yard!
There goes the neighborhood!
Read the article "The Friendliest of Skies" in
the Ventura county Star
(
www.insidevc.com/vcs/business/article/0,1375,VCS_128_1133707,00.html)
Go TO Noise Page for more information.

April
30, 2002
BIGGER AIRPORTS ARE COMING TO AN AREA NEAR YOU!
California Transportation Commission (CTC) and the
Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) released the latest California
plans that may affect us here in the Conejo Valley.
 | Santa Barbara to see $56 million in improvements that
include upgrading the terminal (bigger is always better), improving the runway
safety areas and relocating a runway threshold. |
 | The CTC will also implement the following;
1- Provide state funding to supplement emergency federal funds for security
equipment at smaller commercial, reliever, and feeder airports around the
state.
2 - Control land use around existing airports.
3 - Provide a significant increase in state funding-$20 million to $40 million
a year-to realize the safety and capacity upgrades identified in the
California Aviation System Plan Capital Improvement Program.
4 - Authorize and fund the California Division of Aeronautics to provide
information to pilots and business aviation departments to promote using more
of the state's existing airports in a way that will make better use of system
capacity.
5 - Authorize and fund the California Division of Aeronautics to assist
smaller airports in securing state and federal grants.
HERE AGAIN, YOUR TAX DOLLARS IN ACTION - DO YOU AGREE?
IF SO DO NOTHING AND WAIT FOR THE INCREASED NOISE AND AIR TRAFFIC NEAR YOU!
|

April
23, 2002
District Attorney's office found that The T.O. City
Council majority ANDY FOX, DENNIS GILLETTE and DAN Del CAMPO had no basis to
fire two Planning Commissioners and censure Linda Parks. (See the front page of
the Thousand Oaks Star 4/23/02)

March 30, 2002
Ever wonder where the profits from the sale of gasoline
goes?
All of this information is available from the Department of Energy
at: http://www.energy.gov/
and can be easily documented. Refineries located in the U.S. are
required to state where they get their oil and how much they are importing. They
report on a monthly basis.
How much are you contributing to the support of terrorism?
Now that's food for thought!
Major oil companies
that import Middle Eastern oil (for the period 9/1/00 -
8/31/01).
|
COMPANY |
NUMBER OF BARRELS |
EST. INCOME @ $30.00/BARREL. |
| Shell |
205,742,000 |
$6,172,260,000 |
| Chevron/Texaco |
144,332,000 |
$4,329,960,000 |
| Exxon/Mobil |
130,082,000 |
$3,902,460,000 |
| Marathon |
117,740,000 |
$3,532,200,000 |
| Amoco |
62,231,000 |
$1,866,930,000 |
| |
TOTAL |
$19,803,810,000 |
Here are some large companies that do not import Middle Eastern oil:
| Citgo |
0 Barrels Imported from the
Middle East |
| Sunoco |
0 Barrels Imported from the
Middle East |
| Conoco |
0 Barrels Imported from the
Middle East |
| Sinclair |
0 Barrels Imported from the
Middle East |
| BP/Phillips |
0 Barrels Imported from the
Middle East |

March 6, 2002
(updated 4/2/02/0
Linda Parks Elected
Supervisor of the 2nd District
Developers and special
interests lose and Residents WIN!
SUPERVISOR-2ND DISTRICT
VOTE FOR 1
COMPLETE PRECINCTS: 113/ 113
INCOMPLETE PRECINCTS: 0
LINDA PARKS.................16,234 53.0%
RANDY HOFFMAN...............14,315 46.7%
This election
hopefully spells the end to favoritism and the beginning of the demise of the T. O. Troika. Ideally this signals the return to fair and honest County Government
and a real chance to keep Ventura County free from urban sprawl.

February 18, 2002
For a humorous look at the recent Council action
go to Consill Minuets.

February 13, 2002
The Thousand Oaks
City (Developer
Controlled) Council has shown it’s true
vindictive nature as it held a Kangaroo Court
to remove Planning Commission Chair, Michael Farris, Planning Commissioner, Nora Aidukas and censure Fellow Councilmember, Linda Parks.
With only
supposition and NO evidence or facts to back up their claims, Fox, Gillette and Del Campo proved without a doubt where their
loyalties are and it is not in the best interest of the residents! The Western
Plateau Preservation Plan, a very convoluted plan at best, exists today
purportedly to save open space or is it to benefit developers?
Instead of congratulating the Planning Commission for
bringing to light the fact that par |